Dear Lobo !!!!!!! Not. It is the family of Mr. Delapierre, the kaleidoscopic figalgo who invited us

The conspiracy sanfroilanesco Lugo I leave these pictures here, sent by Arum and I think authored by Ana hand, the conspiracy of Lugo, both are giving the talk at playtime. I could not but be greatly appreciate as generous words Lándoa and chronic or comments Aduanadas and blog Ana Bande.
I thought veals I knew all the residents of this blog and is not, anyone, do not know anyone! Already, I know, are very uneducated, but beyond that, the average Echea or misleading. A greeting and a curious reader fisionomista veals wrong. Wed. oct. 15, 09:29:00 pm
Medela Kamarada Celtic paleuropeo: I would like to know if the shield that is behind his wife and his family. And, in any case, if the peixiños that glimpse veals are the three trout of "Ghayoso" or not. Desemúleme curiosity. Wed. oct. 15, 09:47:00 pm
Dear Lobo !!!!!!! Not. It is the family of Mr. Delapierre, the kaleidoscopic figalgo who invited us in Lugo, in his wonderful home, yes, a house in the center of Lugo. The shield belongs to his family, that is, was perhaps a house in rural Lugo, and was brought to the city by endangered, etc. My family politics, Wolf, as I think VDE. know, descends from the terrible Gothic gift Witiza, princeps associated free state of Gallaecia veals before king of Hispania Gothic. Do not laugh, man, do not laugh, is to him right. In addition, server and your lady are Republicans. veals Obviously nothing to do with Azan, Lister and Lerroux. Wed. oct. 15, 10:07:00 pm
If the Medela is the second from the left in the photo on the table, asegún the Wolf, and the XMG is the third from the left, the Arum should be the first or the fourth from the left, I lean by the first, and between the bottom and the first by From the right are Coba and Delapierre. The Delapierre should be the first on the right. And the best From the Coba is the fourth from the left and not the bottom. What Lio. The two women of the table it is clear who they are. Wed. oct. 15, 11:04:00 pm
Mr. Inquiring: From left to right: * Telemachus. * Oedipus. * Jason. * Áyax. * Ulysses (aka.Capitão Willard) * Calypso Circe * Zeus * Note: Photo taken by * Penelope in Ithaca (aka. Recatelo) Wed. oct. 15, 11:37:00 pm
kamarada Medela, I do not by the river with Witiza kinship, but by mathematics. You like me, like everyone except the Jesus of Galilee a dove that descended on his father's, we have two parents (father veals and mother) and four grandparents, eight great-grandmother, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024 etc ... geometric progression. Also goes to the king of Spain. When chegha you and I, all cheghamos, to the times of King Witiza encotrámonos with a couple of million or six million upwards. veals There is an error in this, but worth us to understand. After another day clarify the error. And probably, not probably, certainly, we find that we are all relatives. , Not only all of this, we are descendants of very few. But I say it highlights for another reason. If you and I, and all have an illustrious ancestor, with forgiveness of their faces (as it says dr. ETXE) also need enough farmers, veals several priests, a few of whores, of asesinos probably some "innormal" that was just raised, as they say in my pueblo, (among the entire population construirnos we need to, we can not reject anything). Perdonade but among the many thousands veals of ancestors that has everything we need, and not all are the king of fries. And it also applies to the Bourbon that borboriña words. When bourbon chegha its twentieth generation, veals like mine, like dacova, veals like everyone, and you upwards of 440,896 veals (ESO happens in about six centuries), and Will were all noble, right ?. Because Putin will contemned, and poof and the psychopath and the friar putañero that needed to constitute this population of ancestors. Or were all pure and chaste and ready heterosexual ?. There are mathematical constants in populations, and in life, you know. And we are equally descendants of all of them, all of them contributed at the time half of their genetics. I do not know if I explain. Why psychological mechanism we look only one, among a thousand, the last names that preceded ?. Who preceded us to each of us. I would give you a psychological explanation hardest ?. And I'm cabreando. and see that we are relatives. I have to know what year was the Witiza to calculate veals the thousands or millions of ancestors we had and then we had to go get rendered Africa and part of Asia because Europe was not. (The error is in incest, which was, and in fact we do not need so many ancestors as early because there was always family involved "in Lio" and were necessarily the same ancestors, but the case is the same, this does not invalidate what I argue). I also have three trout in the family, way back, way back, to distinguish the secondary. But I also have countless tens of illiterate farmers who have the same. In a population as extensive